March, 2003 - Most Current is Listed First
DISCLAIMER: This is submitted by an anonymous source and has been totally verified. Do not contact us for any further
information since this is the only infomation we have at the current time! The identity must be protected
since the reporter must protect the sources. Some/much of this information was obtained due solely to
personal contacts who do not wish their identities known to State Authorities. If you have any verifiable information that you can add, send email
and we will pass the information on to the proper person. Specific inquiries or questions will NOT be answered.
Roving Reporter - Main Page
Rapid END Testing
Roving Reporter - Main Page
March 14, 2003
Some comments were made on this site in regard to the new rapid END testing that we have now revised for a couple of reasons. More media stories have appeared in this regard and they have been added to our rapid END test link. Additionally, we were told that this new test is apparently not being relied on completely at this point but it is felt that the test is a useful screening test. It was also reported by one Task Force Public Information Officer that this test is not yet being used for this outbreak of END.
This makes it a confusing issue at best, so, the interpretation here is based on strictly public news as featured in the released stories. You may verfiy the interpretations for yourself by visiting our (LINK) for the stories which pertain solely to rapid END testing.
It seems that "a recently" quarantined flock in Riverside County had been "slated for depopulation" but due to the RANCH VET, the flock was spared and the government was saved close to one million dollars in indemnities. The standard END test "showed the birds had a virus in the same family as exotic Newcastle." Had the ranch vet not intervened, it certainly appears that another commercial flock would have been killed due to the decision made by the Task Force who was not using the "new fangled" and "not yet proven" PCR test.
A microbiologist has offered this explanation in regard to the postive test:
"The Non approved (used by cock-fighters and available in Mexico) vaccine
will show a false positive on the standard test.
The vaccine is an attenuated non pathogenic strain of the ND virus that is
designed to spread through the hens in a poultry facility without the need
for individual inoculations. In other words the vaccine is contagious.
Exposure to vaccinated birds will transmit the vaccine strain and hence the
Cock-fighters or any other misguided people vaccinating their birds will
create more END positive locations for the TF and propagate this insanity.
If the new test had been applied from the beginning I wonder how many ND
positives would have been due to a non pathogenic strain?
An attenuated vaccination strain while non pathogenic can often cause some
mild symptoms which would red flag a flock for testing.
We need to promote the use of this new test. From an economical point of
view eliminating false positives saves money spent depopulating unnecessary
sites. As well as the quoted benefits from the epidemiological stand point."
In another media story, we note that at William S. Hart in Newhall, the park staff called the USDA on Sunday to report a sick turkey, the Task Force tested three of the park's hens, found them positive and killed them on Wednesday. If the "new fangled" test was not used, one wonders how it was possible to get the test results in such a short period of time.
The rapid END test was invented by a research center that has been known more for war than other things. This test is certainly not the way the Task Force did things in the 1970's so one would guess it will take time for acceptance.
If this site has misinterpreted anything in this regard, it is suggested that the media be contacted directly, since any interpretaions made here are based strictly on their reporting.
All artwork and graphics are the property of Ruger Design and are protected by copyright
law. Any reproduction of these graphics without the written permission of Ruger Design is
forbidden by law.